Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
disk IO request queue

disk IO request queue

2005-08-05       - By Magnus Andersen

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9  

A few more questions...

1. What does you /etc/fstab look like?
2. What does the output from a cat of /proc/sys/vm/pagecache look like?
3. What does the output from a cat of /proc/meminfo look like?
4. Is kswapd/kscand processes running alot?

I don't think there is a big difference between hugetlb and bigpages.
I do know that I didn't have this implemented and I saw similar
behavior.  Since I implemented hugetlb my server has been running
perfect. I also did not have a memory issue, but tuning the pagecache
and bdflush vm parameters help my performance alot.  Also, are you
using AIO?

Magnus


On 8/5/05, nasvel <nasvel@(protected)> wrote:
> Magnus Andersen wrote:
>
> >This sounds very similar to what I experienced when I went live on a
> >RHEL 3 / 9i environment. A couple of questions.
> >
> >1. How are the Oracle share mounted to the system?
> >
> >
> For oracle, we've got 4 harddisk attached to a controller SCSI. We have
> a big tablespace which is composed of 16 dbf files. And the 16 files is
> spreading out on the first 3 disks, and the last disk we use to store
> the index tablespace.
>
> >2. Have you played with Linux vm?
> >
> >
> We've tuned the shmmax and max open files. And we're not lack of memory,
> there is 6G cached memory.
> [mrtg@(protected) mrtg]$ free
>              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
> Mem:      16167632   16105196      62436          0     189340    6684672
> -/+ buffers/cache:    9231184    6936448
> Swap:      4194160    1196604    2997556
>
> >3. Are you using hugetlb?
> >
> >
> no, because hugetlb is not available in AS2.1. But in AS2.1 the bigpages
> is enabled. According oracle, there is no big diff between them. You
> think it's important?
>
> http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/notes/technote_rhel3.html
>
> Enterprise Linux 3 has replaced bigpages with a feature called hugetlb,
> a backport of what is also in Linux kernel 2.6. There are a few
> differences in how hugetlb works. Hugetlb behavior is similar to that of
> bigpages; the pages are backed by large TLB entries, are not pageable,
> and are preallocated, which means that once you allocate x megabytes of
> hugetlb pages, that amount of physical memory can be used only through
> hugetlbfs or shm allocated with SHM_HUGETLB.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
>
> dux
>
> >On 8/5/05, nasvel <nasvel@(protected)> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>since some weeks our database server (redhat taroon + oracle 9i)
> >>suffered from a very bad performance. The load avg climbed sometimes to
> >>80% :(, althought I think I've a powerful machine (HP, 3 Intel Xeon with
> >>16G memory).
> >>
> >>To try to find out the problem, I looked at the iostat report. I found
> >>the await time are pretty high, and the average queue length is about
> >>10. Someone told me that it is normal for a DB server, but I have some
> >>doubt, so I would like to have you guy's opinions about that...
> >>
> >>any suggestion is welcome, thanks
> >>
> >>dux
> >>
> >>=== begin output ===
> >>
> >> Linux 2.4.9-e.62enterprise    05.08.2005
> >>
> >>cpu-moy:  %user   %nice    %sys   %idle
> >>          17,63    0,02   12,31   70,04
> >>
> >>Device:  rrqm/s wrqm/s   r/s   w/s  rsec/s  wsec/s avgrq-sz avgqu-sz
> >>await  svctm  %util
> >>cciss/c1d1p1
> >>         889,26  11,04 515,44 13,11  623,61  193,26     1,55    10,62
> >>21,30   8,03  42,42
> >>cciss/c1d0p1
> >>         273,76  45,13 100,64 48,85  872,20  751,95    10,86    10,62
> >>114,52  26,39  39,45
> >>cciss/c1d2p1
> >>         198,26 108,73 107,90 27,83  326,31 1061,51    10,22    10,62
> >>100,75  26,34  35,76
> >>cciss/c1d3p1
> >>         233,38  29,04 89,97 30,70  463,79  477,95     7,80     8,29
> >>68,69  26,78  32,32
> >>
> >>=== end output ===
> >>
> >>--
> >>Taroon-list mailing list
> >>Taroon-list@(protected)
> >>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Taroon-list mailing list
> Taroon-list@(protected)
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
>


--
Magnus Andersen
Systems Administrator / Oracle DBA
Walker & Associates, Inc.

--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.