Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Oracle cluster configuration : RH Cluster Suite mandatory

Oracle cluster configuration : RH Cluster Suite mandatory

2005-08-24       - By Ed Wilts

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9     10     >>  

On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:58:53AM -0400, Brian Long wrote:
> I believe this provides another reason for people to use SLES over RHEL
> in the future, however.  If SLES includes OCFS support out-of-the-box
> and Red Hat charges an additional $2K/node for GFS, something is out of
> whack.  Or am I missing something?

If you're running Oracle on top of OCFS, Oracle will provide *FREE*
support for your OS plus OCFS.  Who better to support OCFS than Oracle
anyway?

It only gets interesting if you really want OCFS but don't want to run
Oracle.  Then you have choices to make.  Note that you can run GFS for
free without support if you chose to do so although I'd question why
you'd want to run a supported operating system on an unsupported file
system...

       .../Ed

--
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@(protected)
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.