Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Linux - General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Installation - Getting started with Red Hat Linux
Enterprise Linux 3 - Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
Red Hat Linux 9 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 9 (Shrike)
Red Hat Linux 7.3 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.3 (Valhalla)
Red Hat Linux 7.2 - Discussion of Red Hat Linux 7.2 (Enigma)
Apache Web Server
Oracle database, Microsoft SQL server ...
Subjects
application/x mplayer2 plugin
RPM error: db4 error(16) from dbenv >remove: Device or resource
   busy
Command stream end of file while reading
X Windows problem (xauth)
Upgrading openoffice 1 1 rpm
FTP: connection refused
FTP: connection refused
mount: /dev/cdrom: is not a valid block device
Dell Precision 650, RedHat 9, no sound
how to trace the cause resulting in the crash of bind server
Virus on the list
UNINSTALL RPM MYSQL
usb pen drives: mounting as a user
broadcom network interface
make mrproper
sendmail configuration on redhat
Couldn 't open PID file /var/run/named/named pid Permission denied
Promise 378 controller
kernel 2 6 and /dev/sound/mixer not found
Problem using up2date
mrtg step by step howto/configuration for a newbie?
Compiling and Installing Kernel 2 6
Can 't locate module ppp0, can 't locate module ppp compress 21
HOW I CAN MAKE BOOTABLE FLOPPY DISKET
Lotus Notes under Wine
/etc/security/limits conf question
Intel E/1000 driver
Command stream end of file while reading
rpm database corrupt
qla2300 modules
 
Search:  
Power your search with and, or, +, -, or "some phrase" operators.
Oracle cluster configuration : RH Cluster Suite mandatory

Oracle cluster configuration : RH Cluster Suite mandatory

2005-08-24       - By Tom Sightler

 Back
Reply:     <<     11     12     13  

On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 10:58 -0400, Brian Long wrote:
> I believe this provides another reason for people to use SLES over RHEL
> in the future, however.  If SLES includes OCFS support out-of-the-box
> and Red Hat charges an additional $2K/node for GFS, something is out of
> whack.  Or am I missing something?

Historically GFS and OCFS were targeting very difference uses.  OCFS was
very specific to Oracle and didn't support the storage of anything other
than Oracle datafiles required for RAC.  OCFS did not have normal file
semantics and you could lock up nodes simply by doing things like
running a backup with tar from and OCFS volume.

GFS is a generic use clustered file system that should work well with
almost any type of application, not just Oracle as it is fully posix
compliant.

OCFSv2 addresses many of the posix compliance issues, but it still
doesn't seem to be focused on providing support for anything other than
Oracle.  When you look at descriptions of OCFSv2 you get this:

"Unlike the previous release (OCFS), OCFS2 is a general-purpose file
system that can be used for shared Oracle home installations making
management of Oracle Real Application Cluster (RAC) installations even
easier."

And SuSE announce of the feature in SLES9 SP2 says:

"OCFS 2 cluster files system has been included to support Oracle RAC on
x86, AMD64?? & Intel?? EM64T?? and Itanium 2 processors."

Notice, everything that mentions OCFS says "to support Oracle...", using
OCFSv2 for other purposes will likely work, but I don't know who you'll
call when it doesn't.  This isn't true GFS, which is supported with a
myriad of applications.

That what I currently believe is a difference.  That being said, there's
nothing to stop SuSE/Novell from deciding to support OCFS in the future.

Also, it's easy to put OCFSv2 on RHEL4, unfortunately there are a few
bugs in RHEL4 U1 that cause some problems so you have to install a
slightly patched, unsupported kernel, but the OCFSv2 web page states
that those issue are expected to be resolved in RHEL4 U2.

Later,
Tom




--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list

Earn $52 per hosting referral at Lunarpages.