Source of shmget failure 2005-10-03 - By Shaw, Marco
Back
>The trouble with this picture is that the node wasn't running
>anything except the usual background noise -- it certainly should
>not have required 0.83 G to do it. And, the machine had been in
>this "idle" state for a good 12+ hours. Shouldn't that be ample
>time for unused memory to be returned to "free" state?
>After I rebooted, there wasn't any significant change in the
>number and type of running processes. However, there was a *lot*
>more free memory.
>I started watching memory use. In the course of an hour,
>free reported that the memory use steadily increased (from about
>256000 to 260500 -- it makes a lovely graph).
1. Never post in HTML format.
2. (Almost) never worry about free memory in Linux, for example:
http://sourcefrog.net/weblog/software/linux-kernel/free-mem.html
Marco
RHCE
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
