 | | | isn 't samba just supposed to *work*? | isn 't samba just supposed to *work*? 2005-12-20 - By Mikhail Kruk
Back
I usually just put 137-139 (not 135) both tcp and udp.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:26 -0500, Thom DeCarlo wrote:
>
>>>-- --Original Message-- --
>>>From: Arjan van de Ven
>>>Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 9:51 AM
>>>To: Discussion of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (Taroon)
>>>Subject: Re: isn't samba just supposed to *work*?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>I've gone through all the online documentation that I can find. Can
>>>>anyone tell me what might be going wrong here and how to fix it?
>>>
>>>
>>>one of the common gotchas is that there might be a firewall filtering
>>>the traffic...
>>>
>>
>>Ah, it does appear to be the firewall. By bringing up the
>>"redhat-config-securitylevel" dialog and allowing eth0 as a trusted device I
>>can get to the Linux box from WinXP. But, that's probably not something I
>>want to do in the long term. The config dialog doesn't have a setting for
>>allowing samba as a trusted service. How do I set it without the GUI?
>
>
> iirc you can put the port numbers into the gui manually (135/137)...
>
> --
> Taroon-list mailing list
> Taroon-list@(protected)
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
|