802.1q/p tagging 2006-01-30 - By Arjan van de Ven
Back
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 08:59 +0100, Mimmus wrote:
> > are you sure you want to do QoS on that level? Doing QoS on
> > the IP level is a lot easier, so if you think you can get
> > away with that....
> I'm not an expert but I think that level 2 QoS is easier. If I'm able to
> keep 802.1q tag from end to end, I will have what I'm looking for
> "automatically".
> I looked at my switches features and I saw that I can set priority at the
> port, avoiding messing my server/phones with tagging. Downstream switches ar
> econnected with tagged uplinks and they retains automatically priority.
ok if you think that's easier by all means go ahead;)
for the IP layer way, see the following url:
http://www.lartc.org/
it's a really good document to have read about in general anyway, lots
of neat tricks
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
