 | | | nfs slowness with ls - but why? | nfs slowness with ls - but why? 2006-02-16 - By Wally Winchester
Back
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:57:07 -0500, "Brian Long" <brilong@(protected)>
said:
>
> > These machines are in vmware. For the moment, the nfs server and the test
mount machine are on the same blade. The nfs server is directly mounting a LUN
on the SAN.
>
> Which Vmware NIC driver? vmxnet or vlance? vlance is PCnet32
> compatible, but I've seen horrible performance.
I started with vlance. Performance on both was the same, but vlance uses
up a lot more system time (according to "time"), the user time is the
same for both though.
I'm on vmxnet now though.
Simon
>
> /Brian/
>
> --
> Brian Long | | |
> IT Data Center Systems | .|||. .|||.
> Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:..
> Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
>
> --
> Taroon-list mailing list
> Taroon-list@(protected)
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
--
Wally Winchester
wally_winchester@(protected)
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different?
--
Taroon-list mailing list
Taroon-list@(protected)
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list
|
|
|